IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON SEPTIC ARTHRITIS MANAGEMENT

BackgroundSince 2020, the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic has disrupted the organization of healthcare systems worldwide.ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the impact of this pandemic on septic arthritis management in a tertiary rheumatology department.MethodsIt was a single-center descriptive case-control study, which included patients hospitalized for septic arthritis between January 2018 and December 2021, whose diagnosis was retained after positive bacterial growthor on culture on according to presumptive criteria. Our patients were divided into two groups: G1: patients hospitalized during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021), and G2: patients hospitalized during a similar period before the COVID-19 pandemic (2018-2019). In both groups, septic arthritis prevalence was calculated, socio-demographic characteristics, risk factors, clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic data were collected. COVID-19 status was reported in the G1.ResultsTwenty-two patients were enrolled: G1 (n = 15), G2 (n = 7). The prevalence of septic arthritis was 0.77% and 0.36% respectively. The median age was 54.6±12.25 and 54.29±21.81 years old respectively. Diabetes was found in 26, 7% in G1 and 28.6% in G2. During the pandemic, arthropathy and oral corticosteroids use were noted in 53.3% and 28.6% of patients versus 26.7% and 14.3% in G2. The diagnosis delay and the prior use of antibiotic therapy were more significant in G1: 14.08[7-30] d versus 6.5[3.25-19.25] d, and 46.7% versus 14.3%. The knee was the most common localization in both groups. Other joints were affected in G1: shoulder (n = 2), hip (n = 1), and sacroiliac (n = 1). The most common germ was staphylococcus aureus. The duration of hospitalization and duration of antibiotic therapy in G1 and G2 were 26.07±9.12d versus 27.43±10.87d and 50±10d versus 48±25.79d, respectively. Concerning COVID-19 status, 33.3% of patients in G1 have received their vaccination and no recent SARS-Cov2 infection was noted before hospitalization. During the pandemic, synovectomy was required in three patients, one of whom was also transferred to intensive care for septic shock (two of these three patients are being followed for rheumatoid arthritis, and only one has never been vaccinated against COVID-19).ConclusionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevalence of septic arthritis in our department was higher and the diagnosis was delayed. Duration of hospitalization was not impacted, however, atypical localisations, prior use of antibiotics, recourse to synovectomy, and transfer to intensive care were reported. These results suggest an inadequate and difficult access to healthcare services during the lockdown, as well as an impact of social distancing on the immune system [1, 2]. More studies are needed to confirm these findings.References[1]Robinson E. Pires et al, What Do We Need to Know about Musculoskeletal Manifestations of COVID-19? A Systematic Review, JBJS Rev. 2022 Jun 3;10(6)[2]Pantea Kiani et al, Immune Fitness and the Psychosocial and Health Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in The Netherlands: Methodology and Design of the CLOFIT Study, Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Feb 20;11(1):199-218Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is an uncommon but emerging syndrome related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. While the presentation of MIS-C is generally delayed after exposure to the virus that causes coronavirus 2019, both MIS-C and Kawasaki disease (KD) share similar clinical features. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge given the lack of definitive diagnostic tests and a paucity of evidence regarding treatment modalities. We review the clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluations, and management of MIS-C and compare its clinical features to those of KD.

Potential role of Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP) as early marker of bacterial infection in COVID-19 patients

Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that needs immediate diagnosis and treatment to maximize the chances of survival. Bacterial superinfection is a severe and frequent complication among COVID-19 patients and its diagnosis is challenging. Previous reports suggested that Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP) may be a predictive biomarker for sepsis in critically ill patients. We report a case series of three COVID- 19 patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) with risk of sepsis. Method(s): We daily monitored PSP, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in three COVID- 19 patients admitted to our ICU. Microbiological sampling and antibiotic treatment were performed according to the ward organization and in case of clinical suspects for infection. Positive cultures and antibiotic treatment were retrieved from clinical charts and patients were followed from ICU admission up to a maximum of 20 days. Result(s): Patient 1 (male, 55 years-old, overweight, no other comorbidity) was admitted to the ICU in treatment with Ceftriaxone then interrupted on day 7. On day 2 he was intubated and piperacillin/tazobactam was started on day 12 for suspected hospital acquired pneumonia. PSP levels markedly increased on day 10 with no significant changes in CRP and PCT levels. On day 13 a positive bronchospirate for Klebsiella pneumoniae was found. Similarly, patient 2 (male, 70 years-old, mild emphysema and diabetes) was admitted to ICU without antibiotic and with a PSP level of 287 ng/ml. His conditions rapidly worsened in severe septic shock requiring intubation. CRP markedly raised 48-72 hours after PSP with only mild increase of PCT. Patient 3 (male, 78 years-old, no comorbidities) was admitted to ICU with high levels of PSP and piperacillin/tazobactam therapy was started. After 48-72 hours CRP levels increased with no significant changes of PCT. A positive bronchospirate for Ps. aeruginosa was collected on day 3. Conclusion(s): Our findings suggest a potential role of PSP as early biomarker of sepsis in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Daily PSP monitoring may anticipate an appropriate treatment of COVID-19 patients with a septic complication in comparison with the actual laboratory markers. Further studies are needed to confirm our hypothesis.

Covid-19: Cases of inflammatory syndrome in children surge after urgent alert

Thirty fold increase In the province of Bergamo, Italy, researchers have reported a 30 fold increased incidence of Kawasaki like disease since the start of the covid-19 outbreak. Among the covid-19 group more children had cardiac symptoms (6 out of 10), Kawasaki disease shock syndrome (5 out of 10), macrophage activation syndrome (5 out of 10), and the need for adjunctive steroid treatment (8out of 10). In the pre-covid-19 group only two of 19 children had cardiac involvement and just three required adjunctive steroid treatment. A distinct syndrome Julia Kenny, a consultant in paediatric infectious diseases and immunology at Evelina London Children's Hospital, said that the Italian findings appear consistent with cases seen in the south east of England.

Cytokine elimination in suspected COVID-19 perymyocarditis

Background: Only recently studies have been able to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of purification therapies in inflammatory diseases. Here we present the management of a young (21y) male patient in severe cardiogenic shock due to COVID-19 perymyocarditis admitted to the ICU at Bolzano Central Hospital. November 30th 2020 the patient developed high fever (>40 C) and diarrhea. After unsuccessfully being treated orally with a macrolide he was admitted to a peripheral hospital the 4th of December. The day after he deteriorated, required transfer to the ICU, endotracheal intubation and pharmacological cardiovascular support (Norepinephrine, Levosimendan). Antimicrobial treatment was started with piperacillin/tazobactam, linezolid and metronidazole. Despite multiple radiological and microbiological diagnostic attempts the origin of this severe septic shock remained unclear. December 6th the patient was transferred to Bolzano Central Hospital for VA-ECMO evaluation. Method(s): The transesophageal echocardiography revealed 15-20% of EF, lactate (5,2 mmol/l), cardiac enzymes (TropT 1400 mcg/l) and inflammatory parameters (PCT 35 ng/ml, IL-6 685 pg/ml) were elevated. We performed cardiac monitoring via Swan-Ganz catheter. The cardiac index was 1,6 l/min/m2. The peak dosage for Norepinephrine reached 7,5mg/h (1,47 mcg/kg/min). At Bolzano ICU we facilitate the pharmacological therapy with milrinone, vasopressin and low dose epinephrine. Furthermore, we impost continuous hemodiafiltration with CytoSorb filter. Result(s): Only hours after the start of filtration therapy the patient improved and we were able to gradually reduce catecholamine therapy, lactate values decreased. A VA-ECMO implantation was no more necessary. December 10th, we saw a stable patient without ventilatory or cardiovascular support, at echocardiography we revealed a normal EF. Conclusion(s): Clinically we saw a young patient in severe septic/cardiogenic shock due to perimyocarditis. Yet diagnostic attempts (CT-scan, multiple blood/urinary/liquor cultures) remained negative. Despite multiple negative PCR tests for SARS-CoV2 infection we performed specific immunoglobulin analysis and received a positive result for IgM. We therefore conclude on a COVID-19 associated perymyocarditis. Furthermore, this case illustrates the potential benefit of cytokine filtration and elimination in COVID-19 patients with altered IL6 levels.

The use of CytoSorb in a septic shock patient with ARDS due to Sars Cov-2

Background: Septic shock is a clinical condition of sepsis aggravated by circulatory, cellular and metabolic dysregulation. Diagnostic criteria include the need for vasopressors to maintain a PAM>65 and serum lactate levels>2 under adequate fluid therapy. Early identification of critically septic patients is necessary to allow early and adequate treatment with improved prognosis. In this case report we evaluate the haemodynamic impact of CytoSorb therapy in a case of septic shock in a patient with ARDS Sars cov2. Method(s): Patient with Sars Cov-2 ARDS was admitted to our department. He was intubated and had a SOFA Score 7. On day 15 the patient presented an increase in PCT CRP and WBC levels with the need for norepinephrine infusion. Empirical antibiotic therapy was started and after 24 hours also CytoSorb Therapy. Four CytoSorb cartridge columns were used. The first two were changed every 12 h and then the next two were changed every 24 h. Result(s): Two days after CytoSorb therapy there was an improvement in haemodynamic without the need of vasopressor support. There was also a reduction in inflammatory parameters and lactates. The trend of these values was shown in figure 1. Conclusion(s): In this case report we evaluated the impact of CytoSorb therapy in a case of septic shock in a patient with ARDS Sars Cov-2. The early use of hemadsorption with CytoSorb combined with re-evaluation of antibiotic therapy resulted in a marked improvement in the patient's clinical status.

CytoSorb on the Septic Shock

Background: Septic shock, defined as organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, is a condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. One of the hallmarks of sepsis is the excessive release of cytokines and other inflammatory mediators that cause septic shock and multi-organ failure (MOF). New adsorbents are now available as adjuvant therapy aimed at modulating the cytokine "storm" in sepsis. They are thought to be useful if adopted early (within 8-24 hours of the diagnosis of septic shock) in patients who are unresponsive to standard therapy. Here we report our experience with CytoSorb. Method(s): From January 2021 to May 2022, 46 patients with septic shock were treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) associated with hemoadsorption with CytoSorb. All cases presented organ failure including AKI. Surgical patients (n = 13) were treated with surgery, COVID patients (n = 15) and medical patients (n = 16) with medical therapy;all surgery cases were operated on before starting the haemadsorption and in some cases reoperation with the need to suspend the adsorption. The mean age was 69 +/- 17 years (SD). On admission the mean SAPSII score was 50 +/- 11 (SD). CRRT as hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) was performed. All patients received at least one CytoSorb treatment and additional treatments (up to 21 filters in a Covid patient) according to our indication. The CytoSorb cartridge was installed in series to the high cut-off filter;blood flow rates were maintained between 120 and 150 mL/min while dialysis doses from 18 to 45 mL/kg/hour. CytoSorb was renewed every 24 hours. We evaluated the impact of CytoSorb on 30-day survival, haemodynamics and relevant outcomes. Result(s): The 30-day survival was 30%. During treatment with CytoSorb, patients had a hemodynamic stabilization with a significant improvement in MAP, a reduction in amines and a decrease in PCR and PCT (Figure 1). Mortality at 30 days among medical patients was almost comparable to that of COVID patients and higher than that of surgical patients (70%, 69% and 61%, respectively). It should be noted that almost half of the deceased patients arrived late in the hospital, thus leading to a late start of treatment. Conclusion(s): We confirm the efficacy and usefulness of the CytoSorb if adopted early in patients who do not respond to standard therapy. CytoSorb treatment was safe and well tolerated with no device-related adverse events during or after treatment sessions.

Determinants of death in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

Objectives: Death from SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia resulted from progressive respiratory failure in most patients. Whenever accessible, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VVECMO) was implemented to rescue patients with refractory hypoxemia. Reported mortality in this population reached values from 20 to 50 percent, but the direct causes of death were not so widely acknowledged. The aim of our study was to characterize mortality in patients treated with VVECMO support. Method(s): Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database in an ECMO referral centre. All patients with diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection treated with VVECMO support were included. Survivors and nonsurvivors were compared using t-student and chi2 methods. A Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of mortality at admission. Result(s): Ninety-three patients were included (29% female). Median age was 54+/-12 years, mean SOFA was 5.7+/-2.9 and SAPS II was 35.6+/-13.6. Hospital mortality was 24.7%. Main causes of death were septic shock in 39.1% (9 patients), irreversible lung fibrosis 30.4% (7 patients) and catastrophic hemorrhage in 4.3% (4 patients). End-of-life care measures (withdrawal or withholding) were adopted in 65.2% of non-survivals. Patients who died were older (55 vs 48 years, p<0.05), had longer disease course (19 vs 15.3 days, p<0.05), longer invasive mechanical ventilation course before cannulation (8.5 vs 5 days, p<0.05), lower static lung compliance (25.5 vs 31.8 mL/cmH2O, p<0.05) and were ventilated with lower PEEP (8 vs 10 cmH2O, p<0.05) on cannulation. On a Cox-regression model, only prone ventilation before cannulation (HR 9,7;CI 95% 1,4- 68,6;p<0.05) and SAPS II (HR 1.04;CI 95% 1,001- 1,083;p<0.05) predicted mortality. Conclusion(s): Mortality in patients with severe SARSCoV-2 pneumonia treated with VVECMO was exceedingly low in our study, when compared with other series. Only one-third died from progressive lung disease, which suggests that protocol improvement can further reduce mortality.

Extracorporeal cytokine hemadsorption in severe COVID-19 respiratory failure

Background: At least 20% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients develop acute hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring admission to intensive care unit in 5-32% of the cases. Hyper-inflammatory activation characterized by immune cell infiltration and elevated levels of cytokines was reported as the main mechanism leading to critical illness and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). CytoSorb is currently used for all the conditions where elevated levels of cytokines are present. Along with the beneficial effect on systemic inflammation, CytoSorb can be easily integrated with all extracorporeal circulation systems. Case Presentation: Here, we present the laboratory and clinical outcomes of 11 patients with microbiological confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. These patients were treated with CytoSorb to remove the excess of cytokine. All patients were male, overweight and only 3 (27%) were over 70 years old. Median age was 62 years and median body mass index was 28. Best supportive care was provided according to hospital guidelines of that moment and included antibiotic therapy, antiretroviral therapy and protective ventilation. Result(s): Cytokines levels were evaluated before and after treatment. A significant reduction of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IL-1beta was observed. A significant drop of C-reactive protein (CRP) median levels was observed starting from 48 hours after treatment start levels. The decrease in the inflammatory status was associated with a progressive improvement in the respiratory function, with a significant increase in P/F from the first day after the end of the therapy. A similar trend was observed for procalcitonin. Conclusion(s): CytoSorb therapy proved to be safe in COVID-19 patients. A clinical improvement was observed in most of the treated patients despite the severity of the disease. In this study CytoSorb was used empirically for 24- 48 hours based on previous experience in septic shock. The persistence of significant levels of IL-6 and CRP after CytoSorb treatment may suggest that a prolonged treatment can improve the efficacy in controlling COVID-19 hyperinflammatory status.

Hemoadsorption by CytoSorb in septic no-Covid and Covid patients: a case series

Background: Septic shock is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. The reduction of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators by hemoadsorption represents a new tool in the treatment of sepsis. In the present case series, we evaluated the impact of CytoSorb on adult patients with septic shock. Method(s): Patients with septic shock, admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) from March 1, 2021 to February 28, 2022 who received CytoSorb therapy within 72 hours of admission were enrolled in the study. The severity of clinical conditions at admission was assessed by the SAPS II and SOFA scores;The magnitude of the inflammatory response was estimated using the plasmatic levels of C reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). The effect of CytoSorb therapy on the inflammatory state, was evaluated measuring the percentage reduction of IL-6 and CRP. Time elapsed from ICU admission and the start of CytoSorb therapy was also assessed. T-test was used to compare the means of the groups of Survivors and No survivors. Fisher's test was used to evaluated the difference in mortality between Covid and No covid patients. Result(s): Twelve patients were evaluated. Six patients tested positive for covid-19, while the other six did not. Table 1 shows the values of age, SAPSII, SOFA, IL-6, CRP, PCT and timing between the survivors and the no survivors. Overall, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of SAPSII, SOFA, age, CRP. There was a significant difference in the timing of Cytosorb start and percentage of IL-6 removal: In surviving patients the timing of intervention was shorter (3,3+/-1,8 vs 23,5+/-18,9 hours) than in non- survivors. The IL-6 removal rate was significantly higher in the survivor group (70,8+/-15,87 vs 33,2+/-12,26). Conclusion(s): In survivors the timing of CytoSorb therapy was shorter and the IL-6 removal rate was higher than in non-survivors. This suggest that the early applying of CytoSorb adsorber in combination with Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) techniques, could increase the survival rate of septic shock patients. Using CytoSorb was safe and well tolerated with no device-related adverse events during or after the treatment.

ECMO for the immunocompromised pediatric patient: Our experience

Objectives: To present a series of immunosuppressed patients (oncohematological disease, congenital immunosuppression, hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT), and solid organ transplant) assisted on ECMO. Method(s): Descriptive, retrospective study (2011-2020) of a cohort of 9 immunosuppressed patients, supported on ECMO. Medical records were reviewed and demographic, clinical, and analytical variables were collected. Result(s): In our series of 9 patients, 5 were male, the median age was 8 years [RIC 3-11 years]. Considering the underlying disease, 6 were oncologic, 1 liver transplant and 2 with congenital immunodeficiency after HSCT. 4 were under active chemotherapy (median 6 days after the last cycle [RIC 5-188]). 6 were admitted due to acute respiratory failure, 3 due to hemodynamic instability (3/9), (one septic shock). The median PEEP was 12 [RIC 9-15] and FiO2 100% (81-100%). 78% (6) required vasoactive drugs (median inotropic score 35 [RIC 0-75]. 40%. 5 had severe neutropenia and/or plateletopenia in the 24 hours prior to ECMO, and alterations in acid-base balance (median pH 7. 1 [RIC 6.9-7.15]. 5 were on multiorgan failure. TPrimary ECMO transport was performed in 4 patients (44%). Cannulation was peripheral in 80% (57% cervical, 43% femoral) and central in 20%;70% VA-ECMO. Median time of assistance was 15 days [RIC 3.5-31.5] in cardiac ECMO (4), and 29 days [RIC 13.5-42] and in pulmonary ECMO (n=5). The median total time of admission was 45 days [RIC 27-59]. 9 had an infection, 2 COVID after HSCT, and 8 bleeding complications, but only one required surgical revision. Renal replacement therapy was used in 5 (median 9 days [RIC 5-34.5]). Other therapies used were polymyxin hemadsorption(2), intratracheal surfactant(2), plasma exchange(1), infusion of mesenchymal cells(1) and specific memory T lymphocytes(2). 4 patients died, 5 survived decannulation, 2 died later, with an overall survival rate to hospital discharge of 33% (3/9). Conclusion(s): Despite having a worse prognosis, ECMO can increase survival in immunosuppressed patients, in situations that are challenging and require a multidisciplinary approach.

The Impact of the COVID Pandemic on Diverticulitis Surgery

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted maintenance healthcare and elective surgical volume, particularly for benign diseases, including diverticulitis. The study evaluates if the surgical management of diverticulitis was impacted by the pandemic. Method(s): All colectomies for diverticulitis in ACS-NSQIP between 2017-2020 were identified by CPT and ICD codes. Cases were divided into groups by the operation year and quarter variables. The first quarter of 2020 was excluded. The pre- COVID group included cases before 2020 and the post-COVID group included cases after the first quarter of 2020. Associations between groups and baseline demographics and postoperative outcomes were compared. Result(s): 46,839 colectomies were evaluated with 38,860 pre- COVID and 7,979 post-COVID. The groups were similar except for CHF(p=0.027) and ASA classification (p<0.001), which were higher post-COVID. However, pandemic cases were associated with significant markers of disease severity. Pandemic cases were more likely to have preoperative sepsis (p<0.001), wound class 4 (p<0.001), and emergency status (p<0.001). There was no difference in the rates of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or conversion to open among MIS cases. There were also a higher percentage of Hartmann's procedures (p<0.001) post-COVID. However, there was no difference in mortality rates, length of stay, reoperation, open abdomen, readmission, reintubation, or prolonged intubation. There was an association between the pandemic and rates of postoperative pneumonia(p<0.001), ileus (p=0.003), and septic shock (p<0.001). Conclusion(s): During the first year of the pandemic diverticulitis surgeries were performed on sicker patients, more commonly emergencies, and Hartmann's procedures. However, these patients maintained comparable postoperative outcomes.

Pulmonary infections in cancer patients

Lymphangitis carcinomatosa refers to pulmonary interstitial involvement by cancer and is a dreaded clinical finding in oncology because it is a late manifestation indicative of metastatic malignancy, from either a lung or a nonlung primary cancer, and is associated with poor prognosis. Its presentation is nonspecific, often with subacute dyspnoea and a nonproductive cough in a person with a known history of malignancy, but in some cases is the first manifestation of cancer. CT imaging can be suggestive, typically demonstrating thickening of the peribronchovascular interstitium, interlobular septa and fissures. However, a biopsy may be required to confirm the pathological diagnosis as these changes can also be due to concurrent disease such as heart failure, ILD, infection, radiation pneumonitis and drug reactions. Diagnosis allows symptomatic treatment, with personalised treatment directed towards the primary cancer most likely to provide a meaningful benefit. Future research should focus on prospective clinical trials to identify new interventions to improve both diagnosis and treatment of lymphangitis carcinomatosa.Copyright © ERS 2021.

Heart transplant in a Sars-CoV-2 positive recipient: Management protocol of the world's first case.

The advent of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in China at the end of 2019 has developed into a global outbreak, and COVID- 19 is an ongoing major public health issue. During the pandemic, transplant programs had to devise strategies to deal with the possibility of COVID-19-positive donors and recipients. We describe the case of a heart transplant recipient who tested positive with the SARS- CoV2 swab upon admission to our Unit of Cardiac Surgery when a suitable donor became available. Given his clinical status of end-stage heart failure and the absence of imaging and clinical signs suggestive of COVID-19, and his having been vaccinated with three doses, we decided to proceed with the transplant.

A Case Series of Kodamaea Ohmeri Infection: The Hidden Threat Unleashed

Intro: Kodamaea ohmeri, previously known as Pichia ohmeri, is an ascomycetous yeast that has emerged as an important cause of fungemia in immunocompromised patients. During the anamorphic stage this organism is also known as Candida guillermondii var. membranaefaciens. Method(s): We report five cases of Kodamaea ohmeri encountered from multicenter in Malaysia. Antifungal agent of choice will be discussed based on literature review. Finding(s): The cases were: (1) a contaminated peritoneal fluid in an adult patient on peritoneal dialysis;(2) a 60-year-old man with infected diabetic foot isolated K. ohmeri from a bone sample. Both cases discharged well without active antifungal fungal therapy. We observed fatality cases involving (3) an old man with underlying gastric adenocarcinoma who complicated with catheter- related bloodstream infection caused by K. ohmeri;(4) a patient with ventilator- associated pneumonia and septicaemic shock secondary to perforated terminal ileum;(5) and a severely ill COVID-19 stage 5b patient who passed away due to systemic fungaemia caused by K. ohmeri. Discussion(s): All three fatal cases received either amphotericin B or caspofungin as active antifungal agent. Literature evidence has shown that 40% of patient met demise despite on active antifungal agent, suggesting that currently no definitive antifungal agent proven to be a superior treatment option for K. ohmeri infection. Removal of indwelling medical device combined with antifungal therapy has favorable clinical outcome. Conclusion(s): Therefore, K. ohmeri infection in severely ill patients should be considered as a critical condition. Potential of alternative antifungal combinations need to be explored for an effective treatment option.Copyright © 2023

Cool Your Jets Bro

History: Twenty-two year old male basic trainee was brought to the ED after collapsing during a routine ruck march. At mile 8/12, soldier was noted to develop an unsteady gate and had witnessed loss of consciousness. A rectal core temperature was obtained and noted to be >107degreeF. Cooling initiated with ice sheets and EMS was activated. On arrival to the ED, patient demonstrated confusion and persistently elevated core temperatures despite ice sheeting, chilled saline and cold water bladder lavage. Cooling measures were discontinued after patient achieved euthermia in the ED;however, his temperatures subsequently spiked>103degreeF. Given rebound hyperthermia, an endovascular cooling (EVC) device was placed in the right femoral vein and patient was transferred to the ICU. Multiple attempts to place EVC device on standby were unsuccessful with subsequent rebound hyperthermia. Prolonged cooling was required. Physical Exam: VS: HR 121, BP 85/68, RR 22 SpO2 100% RA, Temp 102.4degreeF Gen: young adult male, NAD, shivering, A&Ox2 (person and place only) HEENT: Scleral anicteric, conjunctiva non-injected, moist mucus membranes Neck: Supple, no LAD Chest: CTAB, no wheezes/rales/rhonchi CV: tachycardia, regular rhythm, normal S1, S2 without murmurs, rubs, gallops ABD: NABS, soft/non-distended, no guarding or rebound EXT: No LE edema, tenderness SKIN: blisters with broad erythematous bases on bilateral heels Neuro: CN II-XII grossly intact, 5/5 strength in all extremities. Differential Diagnosis: 216. Septic Shock 217. Hypothalamic Stroke 218. Exertional Heat Stroke (EHS) 219. Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome 220. Thyroid Storm Test Results: CBC: 18.2>14.5/40.6<167 CMP: 128/3.5 88/1831/2.7<104, AST 264, ALT 80, Ca 8.8 Lactate: 7.1 CK: 11 460 Myoglobin: 18 017 TSH: 3.16 CXR: No acute cardiopulmonary process Blood Cx: negative x2 CSF Cx: Negative COVID/Influenza/EBV: Negative Brain MRI: wnl. Final Diagnosis: Exertional Heat Stroke. Discussion(s): No EVC protocols exist for the management of EHS or rebound/refractory hyperthermia. As a result, the protocol used for this patient was adapted from post-cardiac arrest cooling protocols. It is unclear if this adapted protocol contributed to his delayed cooling and rebound hyperthermia as it was not intended for this patient demographic/ pathophysiology. Furthermore, despite initiating empiric antibiotics upon admission, delayed recognition and tailored therapy for his bilateral ankle cellulitis may have contributed to the difficulty in achieving euthermia. In summary, more research needs to be done to evaluate and develop an EVC protocol for EHS. Outcome(s): Euthermia was achieved and maintained after 36 hours of continuous EVC, at which point it was discontinued. His CK, AST/ALT, creatinine and sodium down-trended after discontinuation of EVC. Patient's antibiotics were transitioned to an oral formulation for treatment of ankle cellulitis and he was prepared for discharge. He was discharged with regular follow-up with the Fort Benning Heat Clinic. Follow-Up: After discharge, patient had regularly scheduled visits with the Fort Benning Heat Clinic. His typical lab markers for exertional heat stroke were regularly monitored. He had continued resolution of his Rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury and hyponatremia with typical treatment. Soldier returned to duty after 10 weeks of close monitoring and rehabilitation.

Clinical case of co-infection: COVID19 and invasive meningococcal infection

In light of the current pandemic, doctors need to raise the suspicion of concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection with Neisseria meningitides infection. In this article we reported a case of invasive meningococcal infection in an adolescent with COVID-19. Severity of the disease depended on septic shock due to invasive meningococcal infection associated with sepsis and meningitis. The differential diagnosis with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome was tricky considering the fever, shock, meningeal symptoms, elevated levels of C-reactive protein and D-dimer, patient age, and a positive test for SARS-CoV-2. The disease outcome was good. Given the risk of invasive forms of meningococcal infection, the possible synergy of SARS-CoV-2 and Neisseria meningitidis, the complexity of differential diagnosis in patients in critical condition, immunization against meningococcal infection should be carried out according to epidemic indications, despite the COVID-19 pandemic.Copyright © 2022 Sorbtsionnye i Khromatograficheskie Protsessy. All rights reserved.

Variable Levels of Oxytocin During Sepsis: The Role of Oxytocin in Sepsis Pathophysiology.

BACKGROUND: Although the role of oxytocin in the pathophysiology of sepsis is still unknown, rising preclinical evidence suggests that oxytocin is possibly involved. However, no direct clinical studies have measured the levels of oxytocin during sepsis. In this preliminary study, the serum oxytocin levels were evaluated throughout the duration of sepsis. METHOD: Twenty-two male patients over 18 years of age with a SOFA score of 2 points or more who were admitted to the ICU were included. Patients with a history of neuroendocrine, psychiatric, and neurologic disorders, cancer, an infection caused by COVID-19, shock due to reasons other than sepsis, a history of psychiatric or neurologic medication use, and those who died during the study were excluded. The main endpoint included the measurement of serum oxytocin levels using radioimmunoassay at 6, 24, and 48 h of the ICU admission. RESULTS: Mean serum oxytocin level was higher at 6 h of ICU admission (41.27 ± 13.14 ng/L) than after 24 and 48 h of ICU admission (22.63 ± 5.75 and 20.97 ± 7.61 ng/L respectively) (P-value < .001). CONCLUSION: Our study, while reporting increased serum oxytocin levels in the initial phase of sepsis and decline afterward, supports the possible contribution of oxytocin in the pathophysiology of sepsis. Given that oxytocin seems to modulate the innate immune system, future investigations are necessary to assess the potential role of oxytocin in the pathophysiology of sepsis.

Research progress of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 in septic acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common clinical syndrome in intensive care unit. Sepsis is a clinical syndrome, which is with life-threatening organ function damage caused by infection. As an important part of local microcirculation, the structure of alveolar-capillary membrane is easily damaged in the course of sepsis. So sepsis is the most prime and important inducing factor of ARDS, and it has higher mortality and fatality. As an important constitution of renin-angiotensin system (RAS), angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) has the function of protecting endothelium and regulating the expression of inflammatory factors, so it has received additional attention in recent years. Through the intervention of ACE-2, ARDS and the severity of COVID- 19 can be affected to a certain extent, so the role of ACE-2 in septic ARDS is worth discussing. This paper summarizes the biological characteristics and main mechanism of ACE-2, discusses the possible role of ACE-2 in septic ARDS, and finally explores the significance of ACE-2 in the evaluation and treatment of septic ARDS, in order to provide reference and inspiration for clinical treatment of sepsis-related ARDS.